Rachel Hansen : Good Talks
  • Home
  • What I Do
    • Parent Seminars
    • School Programmes
    • Teacher seminars
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • About Me
    • Recommendations
  • Resources
    • Books for parents & educators
    • Books for Children & Adolescents
    • Menstrual products

Open Letter to the Science Guy in the Lady Top

19/11/2014

5 Comments

 
Picture
This is a guest post by New Zealand writer Sian Hannagan.

The title is ironic, I know what you do, you’re a scientist. Actually a brilliant scientist, doing amazing work in a field which is capturing global attention. I don’t think many people have missed the Rosetta Project and the big things coming from this. I mean, landing on a comet, awesome! The thing is, STEM field disciplines – science, technology, engineering and math, are all historically pretty male dominated spaces. They have an ongoing issue with being seen as exclusionary to women. This isn't your fault, and no one should blame you for decades of discrimination against women. But it is a thing and it is happening. We need to be aware of it. 

Here’s the thing. I don’t hate your top. I wouldn't wear it myself, and if someone wore it around me, I might make a judgement about their character that may or may not be founded. But I support your right to wear that top and wear it with pride. 

But, I also think you made a silly decision, which I think you know too. Because you apologised. You wore a top that you love, to an event you were excited about. You probably didn't think about it much. You dig the top, you feel good wearing it and it was a top you wanted to wear. So you wore it. It just happened that this event was a live televised event with journalists. There was a lot of scrutiny there, and you were there not just as yourself, but as someone representing your field. 

So someone criticised your clothing, and that sucked. I get it. I really do, I mean, this kinda thing happens to women on a daily basis. They get told they are dressed dowdy, or unflattering or too sexy, or inappropriately. Everywhere a woman wears clothes, someone has something to say. And often those things don’t relate to her competence or her as a person. They relate solely to what she looks like. And that’s not okay. When you got criticised I bet you felt pretty crummy. I bet you felt like the work you did meant nothing in the face of that criticism, and that your essential value was being ignored in the face of what feels to you, to be superficial critique. Women deal with this every day. We get it. And we get these criticisms every day because the sexually idealised objectified image of the female form is ubiquitous: it is used through all aspects of life, to sell, to market and to be ogled. She appears everywhere, from advertising, to fashion…to men’s shirts. 

Here’s the thing though, for those of us getting hot under the collar at this journalist for her apparent disregard for your scientific contributions - she didn't criticise your character or your previous work. She just pointed out that the top you wore, wasn't appropriate to the situation you wore it in. You were at your place of work, representing your chosen career, representing science to a wide audience that included women. It’s just when you’re publicly representing an industry known to be exclusionary to women, what you wear matters. A lot. Especially given a study conducted by Catalyst last month revealing 73 percent of women in tech-intensive industries felt like an outsider, compared to just 17 percent of men.  I mentioned at the top of this article how this industry was perceived as being exclusionary to women, right?  So, that. It would be like me wearing a top covered in penises to an erectile dysfunction conference. A bit on the nose. 

So it came as no surprise that the top you wore – which is the textile equivalent of a sexy calendar, porn in the toilet or nude lady mug in the workplace, caught some criticism. 

Here’s the awesome thing though. You totally saw what Rose Eveleth - Atlantic tech writer meant. You apologised and the world kept turning. Except it kinda didn’t.

What happened was a frenzied attack of the woman who made the comment, and feminism in general. I don’t know how many abusive threats Eveleth has received so far, but it’s a lot. And some of those include death wishes and sexist slurs. I mean, there is nothing like a sexist death wish to prove to women that they don’t need feminism anymore.

There are also some shitty memes going around, one comparing protest against rape to your shirt, and calling out feminists as hypocrites. Or the one that says sexism and objectification shouldn't count because SCIENCE (don’t get me started on how people in positions of power and subjective worth escape criticism and even prosecution because of their positions of power and subjective worth). I think it’s important to remember that this is only outrageous to the world at large because it’s a man (you) falling under scrutiny for fashion choices. This happens to women every day, in every career. You could say it happens to guys too (it probably does) but check out this guy. 

I don’t hold you responsible for this; in fact I have sympathy that a lot of this vitriol is being spread in your name and in your defence. It must really suck to be associated with an attack on an individual woman and the movement which strives to stop these attacks from happening. Feminism wants to be standing right there with you, in awe at the song of a comet. So listen to us when we say, we see you for your worth, see us for ours – and wear your shirt on a different day. 


Tags: Matt Taylor, Rosetta Project, clothing, sexism, feminism, Rose Eveleth
5 Comments
John Tiffin
20/11/2014 07:57:27 am

When you start pointing to things like this and say "oh my god that's sexism" it belittles actual sexism, and then when you want to make a point about actual sexism like inequality in the work place people aren't going to take you as seriously cause people will associate you with the nut jobs that think this is sexism. Plus he wore the shirt because a friend (who was female) made it for him and he might have just wanted to brighten up her day a little. Also don't take the stance that he apologised because he was wrong, he apologised because he realised that he inadvertently offended some stupid people. If a woman chooses not to work in a STEM field because this guy put her off then she probably shouldn't be working there anyway

Reply
J Parsons link
20/11/2014 10:41:56 am

Hi John,

Thanks for your comment defending actual sexism. The definition of sexism is "prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex".

Images of stereotyped "ideal" female bodies abound for sale and your viewing pleasure - on shirts, on billboards, on posters, in ads, in cartoons, calendars, porn, etc ad nauseam. Men? Not so much. That's actual sexism, as we experience it, not as you choose to define it for your own comfort.

This renowned scientist wearing one in a historic interview for everyone to enjoy the sexist pictures is sexist, regardless of who made it for sale.

Sexism is already rampant in STEM fields, and not just with this one inappropriate wardrobe malfunction. So why the extra stomp "she probably shouldn't be working there anyway"? You just prove that you do understand sexism, and you participate in it.

Reply
YOLO SWAG 420
20/11/2014 01:35:03 pm

>Men? Not so much
u wot m8, so all those posters of fit men in underwear and well fit suits don't count?

and what are you on about son, "Sexism is already rampant in STEM fields"? Such fields require a whole lotta over time to get the job done, and a majority of women like to be more flexible in their working hours.

objectivereality link
21/11/2014 02:15:27 am

>u wot m8, so all those posters of fit men in underwear and well fit >suits don't count?
Nope. Because the presumed viewer is a straight dude who wants to *be* that guy. The hot lady draped over the car/stereo/un-lady-related thing they're selling? You're not supposed to want to be her, you're supposed to associate her hotness with the thing they're selling.

>and what are you on about son, "Sexism is already rampant in >STEM fields"? Such fields require a whole lotta over time to get >the job done, and a majority of women like to be more flexible in >their working hours.
Nope. That's the "ladies get paid less 'cos they have babies, SEXISM IS OVER!" argument and it's rubbish. As far as sexism in STEM fields, here's a useful summary: http://bit.ly/1zHjEBx

Dean
21/11/2014 01:22:13 pm

The amount of times the word "top" is used in this blog is disturbing since it is referring to a male shirt. Also starting out a response to a comment with a dictionary definition of "sexism" is amateur. The point of his comment was to define sexism as it applies to society in the context of this man's shirt. Nobody is arguing about what Merriam webster feels the word sexism means.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Share

    Author

    Rachel is a writer and educator whose fields of interest include sexuality education, gender, feminism and youth development.

    Click here for blog comments policy.

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn
    Follow rachelhansennz on Twitter
    Picture

    Archives

    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    January 2013
    September 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    December 1969

    Categories

    All
    Advertising
    Beauty Pageants
    Body Image
    Book Review
    Boys
    Breastfeeding
    Car Seats
    Children
    Education
    Fashion
    Fertility
    Gender
    Girls
    Hello
    Inspiration
    Language
    Learning
    Media
    Menstruation
    Mothering
    Parenting
    Periods
    Pornography
    Pregnancy
    Puberty
    Questions
    Relationships
    Relaxing
    Reproduction
    Roles
    Safety
    Self Esteem
    Self-esteem
    Sexualisation Of Children
    Sexuality
    Sexuality Education
    Tampons
    Vagina
    Vaginas
    Violence
    Vulva
    Women

    See blogs and businesses for New Zealand
Good Talks (C) 
  • Home
  • What I Do
    • Parent Seminars
    • School Programmes
    • Teacher seminars
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • About Me
    • Recommendations
  • Resources
    • Books for parents & educators
    • Books for Children & Adolescents
    • Menstrual products